- From: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:00:03 -0400
- To: Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
- Cc: roBman@mob-labs.com, "public-poiwg@w3.org" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Agreed. Is this sufficiently described in 3.6? "POI must have an "id" primitive. It unambiguously identifies a POI within a particular implementation." --- Raj The OGC: Making location count... http://www.opengeospatial.org/contact On May 5, at 12:29 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: > POIs should certainly have a unique ID though. Domain and a token maybe?
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 15:00:26 UTC