- From: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:26:23 -0400
- To: Jens de Smit <jens@layar.com>
- Cc: public-poiwg@w3.org
Jens, I think you probably mean to support both point formats, and only use the GeoRSS GML format (more brevity) for lines and polygons? I can live with that. --- Raj The OGC: Making location count... http://www.opengeospatial.org/contact On Jun 10, at 9:58 AM, Jens de Smit wrote: > I've heard (on the list and on the call yesterday) arguments for both > the short, space separated form and the long, individual key form. > Brevity and conformance to GML/GeoRSS are arguments for the short > form, ease of lookups/XSLT and explicit naming of lat/lon/alt for the > latter. > > Saying "let's use both" obviously places the burden on the > implementors... but I think this is still manageable, so I'd like to > see both.
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 15:27:10 UTC