W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poiwg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD]

From: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:26:23 -0400
Cc: public-poiwg@w3.org
Message-Id: <D4CBBF8A-E3F1-42A2-9A2D-D7E9F91D1A91@opengeospatial.org>
To: Jens de Smit <jens@layar.com>
Jens, I think you probably mean to support both point formats, and only use the GeoRSS GML format (more brevity) for lines and polygons? I can live with that.

---
Raj
The OGC: Making location count...
http://www.opengeospatial.org/contact


On Jun 10, at 9:58 AM, Jens de Smit wrote:

> I've heard (on the list and on the call yesterday) arguments for both
> the short, space separated form and the long, individual key form.
> Brevity and conformance to GML/GeoRSS are arguments for the short
> form, ease of lookups/XSLT and explicit naming of lat/lon/alt for the
> latter.
> 
> Saying "let's use both" obviously places the burden on the
> implementors... but I think this is still manageable, so I'd like to
> see both.
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 15:27:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:22 UTC