- From: Andy Braun <ajbraun@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:30:01 -0400
- To: "Public POI @ W3C" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 12:30:33 UTC
We started a discussion on the call this week[1] that has been floating around for some time. Should the POI spec account for items that are not physical in nature and therefore are not specifically tied to some geospatial context. Examples would be things like Starbucks (the corporation) or a government body. For me the question comes down to one of linking. Does tying individual Starbucks together have value? (and as Alex pointed out is a conceptual POI even necessary for that). The immediate concern is that we end up trying to write a spec that covers everything. This could lead us down a slippery slope. It would great to seem some other thoughts in this area Andy [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/04/13-poiwg-minutes.html#item05
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 12:30:33 UTC