Re: POI WG charter status

Hi Thomas, 

yep I believe the focus now is solely on the simplest definition of
Point of Interest [1] (e.g. lat/lon/alt).

And the references to the Device API groups, etc. have been removed 8(
See the original draft charter [2]

I still also believe we should add references to the SSN-XG and also the
Audio-XG too...Jacques do you have any thoughts on this?


roBman

[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/charter/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/wiki/Draft_Charter 


On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 02:10 +0200, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> Wait, its Point of Interest? Not Pattern of Interest?
> 
> On 10 September 2010 02:04, Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com> wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > I'm fascinated to see how cut-down the charter now is, especially based
> > on the public discussion and apparent consensus that had been forming on
> > this list.
> >
> > Personally I find it hard to see how a solely Point of Interest standard
> > based on the thinnest definition will be anything but very out dated and
> > redundant by Dec 2011 (scheduled date for REC).
> >
> > Also, since so many people will be in Seoul for ISMAR10, ISWC, Mobile AR
> > Summit and the AR Standards Workshop then surely that would be a great
> > time to kick off this discussion in more detail.
> >
> >
> > roBman
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 13:12 -0400, Braun, Andrew wrote:
> >> Hi Everyone,
> >>
> >> First off an introduction, I am Andy Braun from Sony Ericsson. I have
> >> been tagged to chair this POI working group. In addition to this
> >> group, my responsibilities in Sony Ericsson include researching
> >> emerging web and application technologies for the office of the CTO.
> >>
> >> I hope those of you who are Advisory Committee representatives have
> >> already seen that a Points of Interest WG charter [1] has been
> >> submitted for review. The charter details three main deliverables: a
> >> "Points of Interest" Recommendation, a WG Note detailing AR specific
> >> POI properties, and another note that covers how AR and Web standards
> >> can converge.  There are other potentially separate deliverables, such
> >> as best practices, use cases/requirements, a 'landscape' document,
> >> test suite, etc.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The review period ends on the 24th of September, so please be sure
> >> that you or your AC rep fill in the survey [2] as soon as possible.
> >>  If you haven't joined W3C yet, now is the time.  Once the review
> >> ends, there is a two week period where W3C management reviews the
> >> results and creates the new WG.  So, the WG should be ready to go the
> >> week of 11 October.  While we could have our first teleconference
> >> during the week of 11 October, many of the group’s participants will
> >> likely be at ISMAR that week. So I recommend we have our call during
> >> the week of 18 October.  Before then, I'll send out a poll for
> >> selecting the time and date. I'll follow up with an agenda about a
> >> week or so before the meeting.
> >>
> >> With regards to the first face to face meeting, we did talk about
> >> meeting at TPAC in Lyon during November. However, for a number of
> >> reasons which I am happy to discuss, this will not be possible. I
> >> would like to meet face to face this year. With holidays approaching I
> >> believe the best chance would be during the first week or second week
> >> of December.  I will provide more details about the site and logistics
> >> in a future note.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I look forward to a continued interesting and fruitful discussion.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Andy Braun
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/charter/
> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/POI-2010/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 00:28:14 UTC