- From: Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:10:09 +0200
- To: roBman@mob-labs.com
- Cc: "Braun, Andrew" <Andrew.Braun@sonyericsson.com>, "Public POI @ W3C" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Wait, its Point of Interest? Not Pattern of Interest? On 10 September 2010 02:04, Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com> wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I'm fascinated to see how cut-down the charter now is, especially based > on the public discussion and apparent consensus that had been forming on > this list. > > Personally I find it hard to see how a solely Point of Interest standard > based on the thinnest definition will be anything but very out dated and > redundant by Dec 2011 (scheduled date for REC). > > Also, since so many people will be in Seoul for ISMAR10, ISWC, Mobile AR > Summit and the AR Standards Workshop then surely that would be a great > time to kick off this discussion in more detail. > > > roBman > > > > On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 13:12 -0400, Braun, Andrew wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> First off an introduction, I am Andy Braun from Sony Ericsson. I have >> been tagged to chair this POI working group. In addition to this >> group, my responsibilities in Sony Ericsson include researching >> emerging web and application technologies for the office of the CTO. >> >> I hope those of you who are Advisory Committee representatives have >> already seen that a Points of Interest WG charter [1] has been >> submitted for review. The charter details three main deliverables: a >> "Points of Interest" Recommendation, a WG Note detailing AR specific >> POI properties, and another note that covers how AR and Web standards >> can converge. There are other potentially separate deliverables, such >> as best practices, use cases/requirements, a 'landscape' document, >> test suite, etc. >> >> >> >> The review period ends on the 24th of September, so please be sure >> that you or your AC rep fill in the survey [2] as soon as possible. >> If you haven't joined W3C yet, now is the time. Once the review >> ends, there is a two week period where W3C management reviews the >> results and creates the new WG. So, the WG should be ready to go the >> week of 11 October. While we could have our first teleconference >> during the week of 11 October, many of the group’s participants will >> likely be at ISMAR that week. So I recommend we have our call during >> the week of 18 October. Before then, I'll send out a poll for >> selecting the time and date. I'll follow up with an agenda about a >> week or so before the meeting. >> >> With regards to the first face to face meeting, we did talk about >> meeting at TPAC in Lyon during November. However, for a number of >> reasons which I am happy to discuss, this will not be possible. I >> would like to meet face to face this year. With holidays approaching I >> believe the best chance would be during the first week or second week >> of December. I will provide more details about the site and logistics >> in a future note. >> >> >> >> I look forward to a continued interesting and fruitful discussion. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Andy Braun >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/charter/ >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/POI-2010/ >> >> >> > > > >
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 00:11:35 UTC