W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poiwg@w3.org > November 2010

Re: USE CASEs: CREATE versus COMPUTE

From: Christine Perey <cperey@perey.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:41:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4CDB81FB.10409@perey.com>
To: jacques lemordant <jacques.lemordant@inria.fr>
CC: "Public POI @ W3C" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Hi,

I can see a difference between a COMPUTE and CREATE use case. However, I 
believe clarification is needed.

Jacques' description of the CREATE AR Use case below was:

CREATE: POIs can be create using some authoring tools offline or using 
an AR browser in the real world

I disagree with this description.

We defined the CREATE use case, during the AR Standards meeting [1], as 
simply using a system which attaches/contributes a digital content 
“object” to or in the real world. This could be TweetAR.

It does not specify the tools being offline, and there's nothing which 
limits the system to one having an AR browser as a viewer.

Regards,

Christine

Spime Wrangler

cperey@perey.com
mobile (until Dec 7) +86 132 6171 6195
VoIP (rings in Beijing) +1 (617) 848-8159
Skype Christine_Perey

[1] http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/Three_Use_Cases.pdf

On 11/10/2010 1:20 PM, jacques lemordant wrote:
> Some more thoughts:
>
> CREATE was in Christine's list of USE CASE, but  COMPUTE is also interesting:
>
> CREATE: POIs can be create using some authoring tools offline or using an AR browser in the real world
>
> COMPUTE: POIs can be compute in real-time from GIS data (navigation applications) or through location-aware semantic search (cultural heritage applications)
>
> COMPUTE with location-aware semantic search could be a reason to look at a format based on RDF triple
> COMPUTE  with GIS data like OSM could be a reason to look at a format  using  XML triple: tag-value(openstretmap), property-content (opengraphprotocol)
>
> jacques
>
>
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 05:41:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:26 UTC