W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poiwg@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Some more Use Cases

From: Christine Perey <cperey@perey.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:40:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4CDB81BF.40802@perey.com>
To: jacques lemordant <jacques.lemordant@inria.fr>
CC: "Public POI @ W3C" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
Hi Jacques,

I would say that both of these are special cases of the "GUIDE" use 
case. Slide 2 of [1]

The first (maintenance with remote expert assistance) is also a special 
case of "PLAY" use case. Slide 4 of [1]

I think that collaborative AR use cases are interesting, but unless it 
is revised, are beyond the scope of the POI WG charter.

These would be valuable fodder for discussion with the real time 
collaboration industry consortium (the International Multimedia 
Telecommunications Consortium [2] ).

I will inquire with the executive director and management team of IMTC 
if they have interest in participating in the next cross-standards 
meeting in Barcelona, Spain Feb 17-19, 2011.

Regards,

Christine

Spime Wrangler

cperey@perey.com
mobile (until Dec 7) +86 132 6171 6195
VoIP (rings in Beijing) +1 (617) 848-8159
Skype Christine_Perey

[1] http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/Three_Use_Cases.pdf
[2] http://www.imtc.org/

On 11/10/2010 1:04 PM, jacques lemordant wrote:
> A proposal for two more use cases, related to collaborative AR:
>
> 1. Maintenance services with the help of a remote expert
>
> 2. Navigation for people with disabilities with the help of a remote assistant
>
>
> In these two  use cases , POIs are time dependent with respect to their triggering (to account for the collaborative aspect).
> This implies to have a browser doing some polling of POIs (like in Kharma).
>
> To resume, collaborative AR has certainly some implications on POI's data structure to be define
>
>
> Jacques
>
>
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 05:40:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:26 UTC