- From: Patrick H. Lauke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 07:57:26 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
@flackr @smaug---- @mustaqahmed would be interested in your thoughts on this. i don't think there was a rationale for omitting the `over`/`enter`/`out`/`leave` from the mapping for hover-capable pointers ... was it just an oversight? on the question of exact timing, I think the spec leaves that generally unspecified, only suggesting the order in that large note in https://w3c.github.io/pointerevents/#mapping-for-devices-that-do-not-support-hover ... maybe we could do with a matching note in https://w3c.github.io/pointerevents/#mapping-for-devices-that-support-hover as well? it would still be non-normative, but could at least give an indication - or the note that's currently there could be generalised to apply to both cases, with some tweaks -- GitHub Notification of comment by patrickhlauke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/454#issuecomment-1189952580 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2022 07:57:28 UTC