- From: Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 08:26:18 -0400
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On 10/16/2018 07:45 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > Dear all, > > although I originally indicated we'd probably only need one day, we have - as you can see from the schedule > https://www.w3.org/2018/10/TPAC/schedule.html - been given two slots (Thursday and Friday). I don't think we necessarily need both, so could I ask > participants here what their preferred day would be / what works best for them? I'll be busy with web components, happening also on Thursday and Friday. So I'd prefer, I guess, Thursday for pointer events stuff. -Olli > > Additionally, there are a few items/topics that I wanted to have an initial high-level discussion on - please reply to this email if there are more > topics you think need to be tabled: > > - current status: extension of the WG charter until December, PE Level 2 advancing to Proposed Recommendation > > - browser implementation discussion: status on where we're at with real-world support; any quirks that came up during implementation? (I found a few > issues recently with touch-action: pan-x and touch-action: pan-y being VERY fickle about not straying off the vertical/horizontal when performing > actions like swiping, as it almost immediately fired touchcancel...do we need/can we informatively define some "threshold" type behavior?) > > - future of the WG: do we intend to recharter for work on PE Level 3? We have some items in GH marked as future-v3 > https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Afuture-v3 - but more importantly, do we have sufficient commitment from all > participants to warrant recharter, or has interest faded (just looking at the response rate - or lack thereof - I get from messages sent to the list)? > Is there a chance Microsoft, and perhaps even Apple (now that PE is "in development" for Safari/Webkit), would want to join a PE Level 3 group? > > - PEP: the Pointer Events Polyfill (which was taken up by the jQuery Foundation) appears to be in limbo (due to politics/mergers/refocus of the jQuery > Foundation/Node Foundation); should the WG, or one of the participant members (Mozilla? Google? ...) take up the mantle of PEP? If so, how would we go > about this? > > Thanks, > > Patrick
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2018 12:26:44 UTC