Re: Pointer Event WPT Results

So I guess there was no meeting today (though we used the time to have a
nice Google-only discussion of a predicted points API
<https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/38> <grin>).

Patrick, want to include Navid's suggestions on an agenda for next week?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org> wrote:

> This is great Navid, thank you!  This "less than 2" list is small enough
> that I'm sure we can drive it down to zero before too long.
>
> In particular, if nobody else has plans to implement
> pan-left/right/up/down and tangentialPressure/twist in the next few months
> then we can move those to the extensions spec.
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Navid Zolghadr <nzolghadr@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just updated the pointer event test results
>> <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/pointerevents/all.html> with the
>> latest Chrome and what I got from Ted for Edge and from Stone for FireFox.
>> Here <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/pointerevents/less-than-2.html>
>> is the list of those that have less that 2 passing implementations.
>>
>> Maybe we can talk about the failures and a plan to drive them down in
>> tomorrow's meeting.
>> Also that would be great if we can discuss about the two remaining
>> blocking issues against the spec:
>>
>>    - What is the relationship between SetPointerCapture, PointerLock,
>>    and browser default behaviors?
>>    <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/135>
>>    <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/135>
>>    - Specify that "click", "dblclick" and "contextmenu" events are
>>    PointerEvents <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/100>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Navid
>>
>
>