Re: [pointerevents] got/lostpointercapture events: attributes and immediate firing on implicit release

> I personally agree with you. Do you think just moving all attribute 
values to 5.2 along with that table and reference that section for all
 attributes be better?

Yes, that should be cleaner than referencing that table twice before 
it appears.

> Regarding firing events in 5.1.3 vs, they are a bit 
different I believe. They are 2 different routines that call into each
 other in some situations. WDTY?

The mix of "setting attributes" and "firing details" looked a bit odd 
to me. Your suggestion above would reduce the "setting" part in 5.1.3 
into a one-line reference to 5.2, which seems better. So, please don't
 split 5.1.3.

GitHub Notification of comment by mustaqahmed
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 18 August 2016 16:35:04 UTC