- From: Mustaq Ahmed via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:34:55 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
> I personally agree with you. Do you think just moving all attribute values to 5.2 along with that table and reference that section for all attributes be better? Yes, that should be cleaner than referencing that table twice before it appears. > Regarding firing events in 5.1.3 vs 5.1.3.1, they are a bit different I believe. They are 2 different routines that call into each other in some situations. WDTY? The mix of "setting attributes" and "firing details" looked a bit odd to me. Your suggestion above would reduce the "setting" part in 5.1.3 into a one-line reference to 5.2, which seems better. So, please don't split 5.1.3. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mustaqahmed Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/pull/122#issuecomment-240780915 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2016 16:35:04 UTC