W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: F2F at TPAC 2016?

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:01:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY_SBUYOWJ-5mZE+W-daV=8n2k8PY-JOgW1tuHzrJo3_ig@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Cc: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 23/02/2016 14:30, Rick Byers wrote:
>
>> I'm planning on being at TPAC, and I'd also love (at least a short) F2F
>> with whoever else will be present.  I think there's a good chance we'll
>> have some interesting spec changes to discuss around that time, so it
>> could be a great opportunity to make progress F2F.
>>
>
> The deadline for reserving physical space(s) at TPAC is at the end of this
> month. Before I go ahead and organise this, could I just ask very
> explicitly:
>
> - will you be at TPAC ?
>

Yes


> - do you think a F2F would be beneficial in taking the work on PE further
>

Yes


> - any particular topics/activities you foresee doing during the F2


Resolve all outstanding level 2 blocking bugs.  In particular (if not
already resolved): the hit testing issue
<https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/8>, and the mouse event compat
model <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/7>.


> - how much time you think we'd need to allocate for the F2F
>

We should do a lot of the work for the above before hand, leaving the f2f
for primarily any outstanding contentious issues.  I'd want at least 60
minutes, and guess that any more than 2 hours would probably be too much
(plus some social time outside the formal f2f of course).

Could I get a response within the next two weeks please?
>
> I'm actually hoping that we'll do some sort of (possibly informal) F2F
>> sooner for some hacking, interop & compat testing, test writing, etc.
>> after the Chrome impl is ready for that (getting close!).  In particular
>> we need to build a shared understanding of the compat impact of the
>> implicit capture breaking change I'm proposing.  Anyone else interested
>> in this, say on the US West coast (Redmond or bay area) sometime maybe
>> late Q2?
>>
>
> It's likely that I won't be able to make it over for this, but please let
> me/the list know if any concrete plans around this are formed, to ensure
> that stuff gets properly minuted, possibility of remote participation is
> sorted out, etc.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:02:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 16:02:50 UTC