- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:57:19 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
FWIW I'm available for a call today if needed, but in principle I agree with the changes that Jacob made in the PR. P On 12/01/2016 03:28, Doug Schepers wrote: > Hi, Jacob– > > It doesn't seem like the call was scheduled for tomorrow. Should we try > anyway, or should we be more proactive for next week? > > Regards– > –Doug > > On 1/5/16 12:13 AM, Jacob Rossi wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> >> Thanks for sending (beat me to it!). Since we're producing editor's >> drafts of the Pointer Events L2 spec and have consensus that the >> group wants to eventually publish that as a Recommendation, we agree >> that the next step is to recharter the Pointer Events WG. >> >> I've submitted a PR to your charter draft that provides our suggested >> changes [1]. To summarize: >> >> * For the Scope intro, I've used similar text to the previous PEWG >> charter. - I've added specific example features we intend to pursue >> for 2.0 that weren't in 1.0. These are meant to be examples and not a >> commitment nor an exhaustive list. * For Out of Scope, I have copied >> the same scope as the previous PEWG charter. * Pointer Events 2.0 >> deliverable - I've removed the language about building on the Touch >> Events specification. I don't believe it's a goal for the PE 2.0 >> deliverable to incorporate any Touch Events features. * Added Github >> as a forum for technical discussion and communication * Added Touch >> Events Community Group as a point of coordination for the PEWG given >> the related technology >> >> Shall we schedule a call next week to discuss next steps for >> rechartering? >> >> -Jacob >> >> [1] https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/pull/10 >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Doug Schepers >> [mailto:schepers@w3.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 8:19 PM To: >> public-pointer-events@w3.org; Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>; Jacob >> Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>; Art Barstow >> <art.barstow@gmail.com> Subject: Pointer Events Charter? >> >> Hi, folks– >> >> As you know, the Pointer Events WG charter expired on 9 November >> 2015, so there is currently no formal WG; this isn't really a problem >> until we want to publish something, but it does tend to detract from >> a sense of urgency and momentum. >> >> During the last Pointer Events / Touch Events telcon [1], on 3 >> November, the conclusion was that we did indeed want to recharter the >> Pointer Events WG (or some new WG that continues the work of Pointer >> Events and Touch Events). >> >> I've drafted a very rough charter, and I need your concrete feedback >> on what the charter should say, what work is in scope, and what >> deliverables (i.e. specs) should be listed. >> >> We sent out early notice to the AC that this rechartering was going >> on, but it seems to have stalled out. The next step is to finalize >> the charter, and put it out for AC review. >> >> I haven't yet received any feedback on the new charter, or >> suggestions on what it should say; it's not yet ready for AC review, >> and it won't be until I get this crucial feedback. >> >> Do we still want to re-form the Pointer Events WG, or are we still in >> a holding pattern in the Community Group. >> >> Please advise me on what you'd like to do at this point. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2015/11/03-pointerevents-minutes.html#item06 >> [2] http://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/pointer-events-2015.html >> >> Regards– –Doug >> > -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2016 08:57:37 UTC