Re: Pointer Events Charter?

Hi, Jacob–

It doesn't seem like the call was scheduled for tomorrow. Should we try 
anyway, or should we be more proactive for next week?

Regards–
–Doug

On 1/5/16 12:13 AM, Jacob Rossi wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thanks for sending (beat me to it!).  Since we're producing editor's
> drafts of the Pointer Events L2 spec and have consensus that the
> group wants to eventually publish that as a Recommendation, we agree
> that the next step is to recharter the Pointer Events WG.
>
> I've submitted a PR to your charter draft that provides our suggested
> changes [1]. To summarize:
>
> * For the Scope intro, I've used similar text to the previous PEWG
> charter. - I've added specific example features we intend to pursue
> for 2.0 that weren't in 1.0. These are meant to be examples and not a
> commitment nor an exhaustive list. * For Out of Scope, I have copied
> the same scope as the previous PEWG charter. * Pointer Events 2.0
> deliverable - I've removed the language about building on the Touch
> Events specification. I don't believe it's a goal for the PE 2.0
> deliverable to incorporate any Touch Events features. * Added Github
> as a forum for technical discussion and communication * Added Touch
> Events Community Group as a point of coordination for the PEWG given
> the related technology
>
> Shall we schedule a call next week to discuss next steps for
> rechartering?
>
> -Jacob
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/pull/10
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Doug Schepers
> [mailto:schepers@w3.org] Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 8:19 PM To:
> public-pointer-events@w3.org; Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>; Jacob
> Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>; Art Barstow
> <art.barstow@gmail.com> Subject: Pointer Events Charter?
>
> Hi, folks–
>
> As you know, the Pointer Events WG charter expired on 9 November
> 2015, so there is currently no formal WG; this isn't really a problem
> until we want to publish something, but it does tend to detract from
> a sense of urgency and momentum.
>
> During the last Pointer Events / Touch Events telcon [1], on 3
> November, the conclusion was that we did indeed want to recharter the
> Pointer Events WG (or some new WG that continues the work of Pointer
> Events and Touch Events).
>
> I've drafted a very rough charter, and I need your concrete feedback
> on what the charter should say, what work is in scope, and what
> deliverables (i.e. specs) should be listed.
>
> We sent out early notice to the AC that this rechartering was going
> on, but it seems to have stalled out. The next step is to finalize
> the charter, and put it out for AC review.
>
> I haven't yet received any feedback on the new charter, or
> suggestions on what it should say; it's not yet ready for AC review,
> and it won't be until I get this crucial feedback.
>
> Do we still want to re-form the Pointer Events WG, or are we still in
> a holding pattern in the Community Group.
>
> Please advise me on what you'd like to do at this point.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2015/11/03-pointerevents-minutes.html#item06
> [2] http://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/pointer-events-2015.html
>
> Regards– –Doug
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2016 03:28:44 UTC