- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:20:20 +0100
- To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On 25/04/2016 20:53, Rick Byers wrote: > Looks like we have a room reserved both Monday and Tuesday. Ah yes, on second reading I saw that too...you beat me to it. At least that gives the group flexibility if they have other WGs they want to attend. But we can iron out the specifics (and yes, probably only for a short hour or two meeting) closer to the time. P > My main > scheduling contention is likely to be Houdini which doesn't appear to be > scheduled yet (unless the plan is to use CSSWG time Mon/Tues). But > assuming we want only a few hours I'm sure it'll be fine. > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Scott González > <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com <mailto:scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I won't be at TPAC. > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Patrick H. Lauke > <redux@splintered.co.uk <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>> wrote: > > The draft schedule for TPAC 2016 has been released > https://www.w3.org/2016/09/TPAC/schedule.html > > PEWG F2F is currently set for Monday 19th September, room 1.07 > > There are no times set against those WGs in the table, so I'm > assuming this means the room is reserved for the PEWG for the > entire day - so we can probably discuss on list closer to the > time what the best timeslot for our meeting would be. > > At this stage, just the question: does the Monday provisionally > work for everybody who was planning to attend the F2F? > > Many thanks, > > Patrick > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk <http://www.splintered.co.uk> | > https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > > > -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 25 April 2016 20:20:36 UTC