- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:56:08 +0100
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org, "tdresser@google.com >> Tim Dresser" <tdresser@google.com>
On 17/06/2015 23:19, Jacob Rossi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Tim Dresser <tdresser@google.com> wrote: >> I'd be fine with forcing developers to listen for pointerup/pointerdown events to keep track of hover. > > Yeah I agree. This seems like the safest place to start. I opened up an issue to track this and will take a look at a spec patch to address this. Just to confirm my suspicion that a hovered stylus does, predictably, have a pressure of 0...so getting a pointermove event with zero pressure it's a fair bet that it's a hovered (at very very gently brushing against the screen) movement, for instance. As such we're probably right not to magic up a new touching/not touching attribute. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2015 22:56:33 UTC