W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: Pointer Events pull requests

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:56:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY_U4j1zd270XwjuOTS8gHRJEP8pWeJp5AONERGX5QBXEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 4/16/15 6:17 PM, Rick Byers wrote:
>
>> I assume like for TECG we want one of the editors to approve pull
>> requests, right?
>>
>
> If you mean for PRs from non-Editors, then yes, that seems like a good
> workflow. (I *think* we want Editors to continue to follow the "edit first,
> review later" work mode so I don't think a review is needed if an Editor
> submits a PR.)


Agreed.

 Looks like we don't yet have the automatic notification setup to IRC (or
>> the list?).
>>
>
> Notification of all GH activity is now sent to the p-p-e list but I think
> you are correct that gitbot isn't configured for the w3c/pointerevents repo
> and the #pointerevents channel. I'd like to see gitbot be used on
> #pointerevents but I don't know how (although I just submitted a related
> Issue <https://github.com/w3c/using-github/issues/14>).
>
> Does anyone recall who configured gitbot for the #touchevents channel or
> what needs to be done to get that bot running in #pointerevents?
>
>  Before I make other changes, I think we should be normalizing line
>> endings.  Any objections?
>>
>
> No strong preference here (other than to follow the `the most common
> convention`).
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
>
Received on Monday, 20 April 2015 13:57:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 16 May 2015 00:31:59 UTC