Hi, folks– I reviewed this test with the SVG WG [1]. We did not find any errors in the test. However, this test doesn't really test SVG per se; it treats SVG as a single "black box", like an <img> element in HTML, and doesn't really address SVG elements. It's more of an HTML test (in fact, it runs the tests on the container <div>. So, it's a fine test for SVG in HTML, but more (and different) tests would be needed to truly test pointer events in SVG. [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/09/11-svg-minutes.html#item03 Regards- -Doug On 9/9/14 2:16 PM, Jacob Rossi wrote: > Yes, that correctly describes the tests in question. Thanks, > Cameron. > > -----Original Message----- From: Cameron McCormack > [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au] Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 1:25 AM To: > Arthur Barstow; www-svg@w3.org; Doug Schepers; ed@opera.com Cc: > public-pointer-events@w3.org Subject: Re: Request for Review: SVG > touch-action tests (PR-1121) > > On 09/09/14 03:00, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Doug, Cameron - can we please get a commitment from someone to >> review these tests? > > I'll put it on the agenda for this week's call. I am not > particularly familiar with Pointer Events; if the test is just > asserting that SVG elements behave in the same way as HTML elements > with respect to the "look at all of the elements in the ancestor-path > between the one touched and the one with the default touch action > behaviour", then I think that makes sense. > >Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 13:14:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:11 UTC