W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Confusing thing about lostpointercapture event

From: Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:24:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CAO8i3idivO-mH=qaHzeNpk768UrgJ_NnzpJ2tjJSvJ6XQ68N_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maksim Lebedev <alessarik@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
You're correct that 5.2.1 List of Pointer Events should be updated to
include Document as a trusted proximal event target type. We will update
the table to list both Document and Element. Does that change alone address
your concern?


On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Maksim Lebedev <alessarik@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks.
>
> Latest draft of specification of pointer events have point 10.3.1 Implicit
> Release of Pointer Capture:
> If the pointer capture target override is removed from the document tree,
> clear the pending pointer capture target override and pointer capture
> target override nodes and fire a Pointer Event named lostpointercapture at
> the document.
>
> But according with point 5.2.2 List of Pointer Events
> lostpointercapture event can be fired only at element.
>
> This dissonance has confusing actions for me. Maybe we should change
> something?
>
> Thanks, Maksim Lebedev.
>
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 15:25:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:10 UTC