W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Confusing thing about lostpointercapture event

From: Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 07:41:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CAO8i3ieaAtpj8raLMSpRpW+V1L0fy0GGJLwBAZ1Ux2oEdJjV6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maksim Lebedev <alessarik@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Firing at the node would mean that the event can't bubble through the
document. Do you suggestions on different behaviors or use cases where this
will be problematic?

On Monday, September 1, 2014, Maksim Lebedev <alessarik@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks.
>
> Latest draft of specification of pointer events have point 10.3.1 Implicit
> Release of Pointer Capture:
> If the pointer capture target override is removed from the document tree,
> clear the pending pointer capture target override and pointer capture
> target override nodes and fire a Pointer Event named lostpointercapture at
> the document.
>
> But according with point 5.2.2 List of Pointer Events
> lostpointercapture event can be fired only at element.
>
> This dissonance has confusing actions for me. Maybe we should change
> something?
>
> Thanks, Maksim Lebedev.
>
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 11:42:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:10 UTC