- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:52:14 +0000
- To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Just as an initial question: would it be in scope for the pointer events spec to have an informative note about the relationship of pointer events and the (reverse engineered) W3C Touch Events spec? In particular, I'm thinking something to the effect that touch events and pointer events are different at a fundamental implementation level (e.g. when mouse compat is dispatched, the fact that touch events treat click as mouse compat, the implicit vs explicit capture model), and that this spec does not cover how these different models can be reconciled...and that it's up to UAs to work this out? (partly inspired by https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105463#c33) Thoughts? P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 31 January 2014 00:52:40 UTC