- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:36:47 +0000
- To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On 17/01/2014 17:46, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > On 17/01/2014 16:26, Rick Byers wrote: >> Just to follow-up for the sake of the list: I think we all agree this >> text could be clearer. Patrick volunteered >> (https://twitter.com/jacobrossi/status/408261566614614016) to propose >> some alternate text, ideally including some simple examples. >> >> And for the record we're all using 'dispatch' in the same sense - "send" >> (the kill/stop usage is less common, and not used at all in the context >> of events AFAIK). Not sure what the best way to do this is...is there a bugtracker where I can attach things? (assuming it's not the done thing to send messages with attachments on this list) In the meantime, I had an initial thought about 5.2.1 - see the fragment I put up on https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48771/pointerEvents-5.2.1-patch.html - changes naively marked with [ED]. Compare with current https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#list-of-pointer-events P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 20 January 2014 00:37:12 UTC