- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:08:04 -0400
- To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Today's call is still 11:00 Boston and 08:00 SFO time but it is one hour earlier for EU -> 16:00 Paris and 17:00 Helsinki. On 3/11/13 7:59 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: > Below is the draft agenda for PEWG's 12 March call. Discussion on the > agenda topics in advance of the meeting is encouraged, especially if > you will not be able to attend the call. > > Reminder: March 19 is the deadline for comments for the Pointer Events > Last Call <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-pointerevents-20130219/> > > -Thanks, ArtB > > 1. Getting started > > a. Tweak Agenda > b. Determine scribe > > 2. Last Call comments - here is a list of comments from Jacob > including status and in some cases a proposed resolution. If we have > consensus on a comment, we should record the resolution and ask the > commenter if they agree (or not) with the group's decision. > > a. pointerType Extensibility - closed for V1 > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0172.html>. > Feb 26 discussion > <http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-pointerevents-minutes.html#item04>. > > b. Missing rotation attribute on PointerEvent - is there a compelling > reason to add? > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0171.html> > > c. Should pointerId be an integer? No. Add a non-normative note e.g. > the following? > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0170.html>. > (Feb 26 discussion > <http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-pointerevents-minutes.html#item05>.) > > [[ > The pointerId selection algorithm is implementation specific. > Therefore authors cannot assume values convey any particular meaning > other than an identifier for the pointer that is unique from all other > active pointers. As an example, values are not guaranteed to be > monotonically increasing. > ]] > > d. Editorial suggestion from Alex Russell - "The spec should lead with > examples, i.e., move Section 9 to where Section 2 is now." No > objections. > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> > > e. Change buttons field representation? No. But add this to V.Next > list. > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> > > f. The new touch-action CSS property seems to have conceptual overlap > with the pointer-events property. Close this one without any action. > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> > > g. navigator.maxTouchPoints seems deeply touch-specific? Yes it is > touch specific. > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> > > h. Clarify the positioning of the spec? "The pointer event spec does > not require other device events be supported (e.g. mouse events, touch > events, etc.)" > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> > > i. Click and contextmenu events coming to a closure. Clarify that > contextmenu is not a compatibility mouse event. > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0163.html>. > February 26 discussion > <http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-pointerevents-minutes.html#item06>. > > 3. Test Assertion: status, plans > > 4. Any other Business: implementation status > > = Logistics > > * Time: UTC: 16:00; Helsinki: 18:00; Paris: 17:00; Boston: 11:00; San > Francisco: 08:00; Tokyo: 01:00 (Wed); Duration = 60 minutes maximum > > * Phone Numbers: W3C's Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200; PIN = 7394# > (PEWG#); SIP information <http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP> > > * IRC: irc://irc.w3.org/ ; channel #pointerevents > > * Meetings page: <http://www.w3.org/wiki/PointerEvents/Meetings> > (includes "tips" on IRC, scribing, etc.) > > * Minutes wiki: <http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/Minutes> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 14:08:31 UTC