- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 07:59:02 -0400
- To: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Below is the draft agenda for PEWG's 12 March call. Discussion on the agenda topics in advance of the meeting is encouraged, especially if you will not be able to attend the call. Reminder: March 19 is the deadline for comments for the Pointer Events Last Call <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-pointerevents-20130219/> -Thanks, ArtB 1. Getting started a. Tweak Agenda b. Determine scribe 2. Last Call comments - here is a list of comments from Jacob including status and in some cases a proposed resolution. If we have consensus on a comment, we should record the resolution and ask the commenter if they agree (or not) with the group's decision. a. pointerType Extensibility - closed for V1 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0172.html>. Feb 26 discussion <http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-pointerevents-minutes.html#item04>. b. Missing rotation attribute on PointerEvent - is there a compelling reason to add? <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0171.html> c. Should pointerId be an integer? No. Add a non-normative note e.g. the following? <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0170.html>. (Feb 26 discussion <http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-pointerevents-minutes.html#item05>.) [[ The pointerId selection algorithm is implementation specific. Therefore authors cannot assume values convey any particular meaning other than an identifier for the pointer that is unique from all other active pointers. As an example, values are not guaranteed to be monotonically increasing. ]] d. Editorial suggestion from Alex Russell - "The spec should lead with examples, i.e., move Section 9 to where Section 2 is now." No objections. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> e. Change buttons field representation? No. But add this to V.Next list. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> f. The new touch-action CSS property seems to have conceptual overlap with the pointer-events property. Close this one without any action. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> g. navigator.maxTouchPoints seems deeply touch-specific? Yes it is touch specific. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> h. Clarify the positioning of the spec? "The pointer event spec does not require other device events be supported (e.g. mouse events, touch events, etc.)" <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0169.html> i. Click and contextmenu events coming to a closure. Clarify that contextmenu is not a compatibility mouse event. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2013JanMar/0163.html>. February 26 discussion <http://www.w3.org/2013/02/26-pointerevents-minutes.html#item06>. 3. Test Assertion: status, plans 4. Any other Business: implementation status = Logistics * Time: UTC: 16:00; Helsinki: 18:00; Paris: 17:00; Boston: 11:00; San Francisco: 08:00; Tokyo: 01:00 (Wed); Duration = 60 minutes maximum * Phone Numbers: W3C's Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200; PIN = 7394# (PEWG#); SIP information <http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP> * IRC: irc://irc.w3.org/ ; channel #pointerevents * Meetings page: <http://www.w3.org/wiki/PointerEvents/Meetings> (includes "tips" on IRC, scribing, etc.) * Minutes wiki: <http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/Minutes>
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 11:59:28 UTC