W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Request to review Web IDL in Pointer Events LC

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:29:11 -0400
Message-ID: <515EFBD7.2050909@mit.edu>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
CC: "Ms2ger @ Mozilla" <ms2ger@gmail.com>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
On 4/5/13 9:43 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/default/pointerEvents.html>

The IDL looks fine.

Two other comments:

1)  If the intent is that the gotpointercapture and lostpointercapture 
events fire async after set/releasePointerCapture returns, that should 
be made more clear, I think.  Right now an implementation could choose 
to fire them either sync or async...

2)  It's not clear to me why the 'touch-action' CSS property is 
restricted to only applying to block-level elements and SVG.  Shouldn't 
I be able to set touch-action on an <img>, say, without making it 
'display: block'?

Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 16:29:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:25 UTC