Re: Request to review Web IDL in Pointer Events LC

On 4/5/13 9:43 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> <>

The IDL looks fine.

Two other comments:

1)  If the intent is that the gotpointercapture and lostpointercapture 
events fire async after set/releasePointerCapture returns, that should 
be made more clear, I think.  Right now an implementation could choose 
to fire them either sync or async...

2)  It's not clear to me why the 'touch-action' CSS property is 
restricted to only applying to block-level elements and SVG.  Shouldn't 
I be able to set touch-action on an <img>, say, without making it 
'display: block'?


Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 16:29:44 UTC