RE: Updated Implementation Report input sheet

Renato,

I’ve modified the sheet:

* Test Case ID as column B
* Changed the heading of column C
* New column D: CR Exit Criteria ID. And I started to add IDs to test the layout – it is NOT complete! But I noticed that a/ a Test Case can correspond to multiple Exit Criteria and b/ in this case the full IDs like CR-IM-08 are too long. Therefore I suggest to use only “-08”
* The headings of columns D, E and F have a link to the corresponding Test Regime page

And you can edit the sheet, Renato.

 

Open question: should the sorting be changed? I feel the current sorting helps an implementer as the list is segmented into the evaluation of examples and the validation actions of normalizing and executing a validation.

 

Best,

Michael

 

From: Renato Iannella [mailto:renato.iannella@monegraph.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 5:15 AM
To: POE Public <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Updated Implementation Report input sheet

 

 

On 28 Sep 2017, at 21:14, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org <mailto:mdirector@iptc.org> > wrote:

 

Workaround: we create an “outsourced” Feature List page in the context of the Test Regime and this list has an id for each feature.

Finally: who maps the Validation items and the IM examples (of the Evaluator page) to the Features?

 

Michael, I have created the list of id-ed Exit Criteria:

   https://github.com/w3c/poe/blob/gh-pages/test/cr-exit.md

(and now linked from https://github.com/w3c/poe/blob/gh-pages/test/test-regime.md)

 

Can we add a new column (“CR Feature ID”) to the spreadsheet to add the link from the test case to the CR id?

(and let me have edit rights to this new column ;-)

 

Also, perhaps rename column B from “Feature” to “Test Case Name” and move Column C before B with the name “Test Case ID"

 

 

Renato Iannella, Monegraph

Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group