Re: Updated design of Implementation Results input sheet (Google)

> On 2 Oct 2017, at 17:11, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org <mailto:mdirector@iptc.org>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ivan,
> thanks for your feedback.
> Re “headers”: that will work, rows without a Test Case ID will be shown in bold by the script.
> Re line/row 80: sorry, can’t get the issue. N# Test Cases are Normalization cases on the Validation page https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Validation <https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Validation> and N5 is about creating multiple atomic rules from a compound rule with multiple targets and/or actions - or did I misunderstand your message?

- N4 in the wiki page is categorized under 'Normalization' and, in the spreadsheet, there is an 'X' for the column 'Validation'
- N5 in the wiki page is categorized under 'Normalization' and, in the spreadsheet, there isn't any 'X' neither for 'Validation' nor for 'Evaluator'. 

N5 is the only one that does not belong to any of those two. If you say that is normal, I believe you!

Ivan



>  
> Best,
> Michael
>  
> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>] 
> Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 4:13 PM
> To: Michael Steidl <mdirector@iptc.org <mailto:mdirector@iptc.org>>
> Cc: Dr. Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com <mailto:renato.iannella@monegraph.com>>; Benedict Whittam Smith <benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com <mailto:benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com>>; W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-poe-wg@w3.org>>
> Subject: Re: Updated design of Implementation Results input sheet (Google)
>  
> Hi Michael,
>  
> (I presume that you would dump the spread sheet into HTML or Markdown in the final report.)
>  
> I do like it. Just two minor things:
>  
> - (I hope it is all right with you) I have changed the "header" for each feature into bold; it makes the text properly segmented and makes it clearer in my view. I hope that can be retained when converted into HTML.
> - I found a test that is nether evaluator nor validation test: line 80. Is there something missing there?
>  
> Otherwise if we dump it into some fixed format, like HTML, then I guess this is fine.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Ivan
>  
>  
>> On 2 Oct 2017, at 15:52, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org <mailto:mdirector@iptc.org>> wrote:
>>  
>> Hi all,
>> At today’s POE call Ivan suggested to make the Exit Criteria the key elements of the Implementation Report and to make Test Cases sub-items of each Exit Criterium.
>> Following Exit Criteria page on Github - https://github.com/w3c/poe/blob/gh-pages/test/cr-exit.md <https://github.com/w3c/poe/blob/gh-pages/test/cr-exit.md> - I’ve updated the input sheet now: https://goo.gl/iXnonW <https://goo.gl/iXnonW> - please ignore rows below 95.
>>  
>> A few notes on the cr-exit.md:
>> CR-IM-01: has V6 2 times, guess should have V5 too
>> CR-IM-12: E15 has only 4 sub-cases
>>  
>> Be aware of the 3 Exit Criteria without a test case currently – notice in pink. Should be filled in soon.
>>  
>> Please let’s discuss this redesign at the level of the Google sheet first, after an agreement I’ll adapt the script creating the standalone HTML page from it.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Michael
> 
>  
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C 
> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>

----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>