Re: Action Definitions

> On 30 May 2017, at 15:00, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote
> 
> that is (was?) not true though, right?
> IIRC, duties have (and can only use) their own set of actions [2] which is disjoint from the set of actions for perm/proh [3].

No ;-}

Currently  all actions are simply “a :Action” and we do not (in the ontology) make any difference with Actions for Perms/Prohibs and those for Duties.
We only make this distinction in the specification.

There is also some wide-review feedback to also remove this distinction from the specification [1].

The argument being, for example, that we should not stop anyone using “delete” as a Permission, or Prohibition, or Duty.

Renato Iannella, Monegraph
Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group

[1] https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/164 <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/164>