Re: Test suite skeleton

> We can shortcut that development effort by providing the SHACL files 
> and pointing people to the SHACL playground.

I gave it a shot [1].

br, simon

[1] 
https://github.com/simonstey/ODRL-SHACL-Shapes/wiki/SHACL-Shapes-for-validating-ODRL-Policies

---
DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna

www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys

Am 2017-05-11 09:09, schrieb Simon Steyskal:
> Hi!
> 
>> I have not followed the latest evolution, so I do
>> not know who stable it is now; Simon or Phil could tell us. Also: are
>> there implementations for SHACL, is there a tool I can install on my
>> machine for SHACL? Relying on a single playground site may not be good
>> enough (eg, if an implementer wants to check things locally)
> 
> yes, cf. http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-test-suite/.
> Application-wise, you could either use the free version of TBC [1] or
> use Holger's open-source Java SHACL API [2].
> 
>> I have just seen a request going by whereby SHACL should go to
>> Proposed Recommendation soon
> 
> yes, we voted on that yesterday [3] :)
> 
> [1] http://www.topquadrant.com/downloads/topbraid-composer-install/
> [2] https://github.com/TopQuadrant/shacl
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2017/05/10-shapes-minutes.html#resolution07
> 
> 
> ---
> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
> 
> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
> 
> Am 2017-05-11 08:48, schrieb Ivan Herman:
>>> On 11 May 2017, at 08:48, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 11 May 2017, at 01:54, Renato Iannella
>>> <renato.iannella@monegraph.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 10 May 2017, at 18:42, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>>> I've also been thinking more about the SHACL issue. If we don't
>>> provide those, then how will someone test whether their ODRL is
>>> valid?
>>> 
>>> What did the W3C Annotation WG use?
>> 
>> We did not use SHACL and it was more a 'manual' check for the test
>> cases. But remember when we did the testing the situation around SHACL
>> was fairly messy. I have not followed the latest evolution, so I do
>> not know who stable it is now; Simon or Phil could tell us. Also: are
>> there implementations for SHACL, is there a tool I can install on my
>> machine for SHACL? Relying on a single playground site may not be good
>> enough (eg, if an implementer wants to check things locally)
>> 
>> I have just seen a request going by whereby SHACL should go to
>> Proposed Recommendation soon
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>>>> Renato Iannella, Monegraph
>>>> Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working
>>>> Group
>>> 
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704

Received on Thursday, 11 May 2017 08:31:45 UTC