- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 09:09:38 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "Dr. Renato Iannella" <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>, W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
Hi! > I have not followed the latest evolution, so I do > not know who stable it is now; Simon or Phil could tell us. Also: are > there implementations for SHACL, is there a tool I can install on my > machine for SHACL? Relying on a single playground site may not be good > enough (eg, if an implementer wants to check things locally) yes, cf. http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-test-suite/. Application-wise, you could either use the free version of TBC [1] or use Holger's open-source Java SHACL API [2]. > I have just seen a request going by whereby SHACL should go to > Proposed Recommendation soon yes, we voted on that yesterday [3] :) [1] http://www.topquadrant.com/downloads/topbraid-composer-install/ [2] https://github.com/TopQuadrant/shacl [3] https://www.w3.org/2017/05/10-shapes-minutes.html#resolution07 --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2017-05-11 08:48, schrieb Ivan Herman: >> On 11 May 2017, at 08:48, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> >> On 11 May 2017, at 01:54, Renato Iannella >> <renato.iannella@monegraph.com> wrote: >> >> On 10 May 2017, at 18:42, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: >> I've also been thinking more about the SHACL issue. If we don't >> provide those, then how will someone test whether their ODRL is >> valid? >> >> What did the W3C Annotation WG use? > > We did not use SHACL and it was more a 'manual' check for the test > cases. But remember when we did the testing the situation around SHACL > was fairly messy. I have not followed the latest evolution, so I do > not know who stable it is now; Simon or Phil could tell us. Also: are > there implementations for SHACL, is there a tool I can install on my > machine for SHACL? Relying on a single playground site may not be good > enough (eg, if an implementer wants to check things locally) > > I have just seen a request going by whereby SHACL should go to > Proposed Recommendation soon > > Ivan > >> Ivan >> >>> Renato Iannella, Monegraph >>> Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working >>> Group >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C >> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Publishing@W3C Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2017 07:10:12 UTC