- From: VÃctor RodrÃguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:10:49 +0100
- To: public-poe-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ce94a324-901a-1367-d825-e0a0e607590b@fi.upm.es>
Ben, all, This is not a critical point, still, I would like to hear your opinion. Stemming from another context, I bring here a difficult question, related to the POE.UC.10 (link <https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Use_Cases#POE.UC.10_Pay-by-Use>) Please think of the policy I invented below. In a word, there are two permissions: - "You can play an asset 5 times for free" - "You can play an asset 7 times at the price of 5 AUD." :perm1 a odrl:Permission ; odrl:assignee <...> ; odrl:assigner <...> ; odrl:target <...> ; odrl:action odrl:play ; odrl:constraint :constraint1. :constraint1 a odr:Constraint ; odrl:operator odrl:lt odrl:rightOperand "5" odrl:leftOperand odrl:count ; :perm2 a odrl:Permission ; odrl:assignee <...> ; odrl:assigner <...> ; odrl:target <...> ; odrl:action odrl:play ; odrl:duty :duty2 ; odrl:constraint :constraint2.| :constraint2 a||odrl:Constraint ; | odrl:operator odrl:lt odrl:rightOperand "7" odrl:leftOperand odrl:count ; ||:duty2 a||odrl:Constraint ; odrl:constraint [ a odrl:Constraint odrl:leftOperand odrl:payAmount ; odrl:operator odrl:eq ; odrl:rightOperand 5.00 ; odrl:unit <http://cvx.iptc.org/iso4217a:AUD> ] . || One may understand that there are 12 licit plays of the item (5 free and 7 paying). Then... How to express that a certain play should be discounted from the "free" permission? Someone else may understand that there are 7 licit plays (5 free, and 2 paying). Which is the correct interpretation? Regards, Víctor (There was an email on 28/11/2016 12:30 by Ben on this constraint, but he did not ask on this...)
Received on Monday, 30 January 2017 14:12:08 UTC