- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 08:31:19 +0100
- To: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>, W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
This is helpful, thank you. Should I still write the use case? IMO, where we have cases like this that ODRL can handle already, it's about explanation in the Primer, but how are we going to capture these now, if not in the UCR? Phil On 07/09/2016 08:22, Renato Iannella wrote: > > And if we add: > odrl:prohibition > odrl:action odrl:extract; > > We should then support Phil’s use case. > > Renato Iannella, Monegraph > Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2016 07:31:19 UTC