- From: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:42:45 +1000
- To: W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
> On 22 Aug 2016, at 23:05, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > > simonstey: feels that can be solved this way: having a time > constraint closing on date 1 and a permission starting on date > 1 +1day, all in one policy > ... a relative statement could be "the permission B gets active > after constraint X has expired" > > phila: sound interesting, will we explain somewhere that this > can be done already with ODRL > ... such use cases should be documented somewhere - I need this > for my project We have 11 scenarios in the ODRL Information Model [1] which are aimed at explaining/showing how ODRL expresses some common uses. Scenario 8 [2] shows how to use a Permission and Prohibition together which could be the solution to Use Case 03 [3]. Perhaps we should update the narrative of some of the Info Model Scenarios to be more “realistic” (as they were made-up at the time) to showcase more relevant uses? Also, how do people react to the UML Object diagrams? Does it help in understanding the scenario? (Note: We should also add direct links from the Scenarios to the Vocab/Express doc to show encodings..added to issue list) Renato Iannella, Monegraph Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/#scenarios [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/#permissionAndProhibition [3] https://www.w3.org/TR/poe-ucr/#embargoedDataset
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2016 02:43:21 UTC