Re: Typos in the PR document of ODRL Information Model 2.2

Many Thanks for your feedback.

We will update the spec.

Renato Iannella, Monegraph
Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group


> On 14 Jan 2018, at 18:04, 上綱秀治 <ax2s-kmtn@asahi-net.or.jp> wrote:
> 
> Dear Sir and Madam
> 
> This is Shuji Kamitsuna@Japan.
> 
> I found some possible typos below in the PR document of ODRL Information Model 2.2. at
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/PR-odrl-model-20180104/
> 
> Sec. 2.3.1: "the recipient the Rule" might be "the recipient of the Rule".
> Sec. 2.3.3, in the Example Use Case: "would the assignee" might be "would be the assignee".
> Sec. 2.6: "disjoint will all other..." might be "disjoint with all other...".
> Sec. 2.6.7, in the Example Use Case: "will be that the MUST" might be "will be that it MUST" or "will be that he/she MUST".
> Sec. 3.3: "a subclass the ODRL Policy class" might be "a subclass of the ODRL Policy class".
> 
> Thank you for the great specification!
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> --
> *******************
> KAMITSUNA, Shuji.
> ax2s-kmtn@asahi-net.or.jp
> http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~ax2s-kmtn/
> 
>