(Thanks Phil ;-) > > 1. The WG thinks the use case can probably be met with the existing ODRL spec (i.e. you're not presenting new requirements, although the WG will need to expolain how to do what you're trying to do). Are there other UCs you would like us to consider, apart from [1]? We found that ODRL can satisfy your UC (as long as you add an Action to the Duty). We considered the comment "ODRL seems quite unfit with expressing general constraints on values in RDF graphs” but thought that this was not an ODRL issue, more of an RDF validation issue. > 1a. That said, it throws up the notion of attaching different bits of the policy to different resources (the Dataset and the Distribution) which needs to be addressed. Which ODRL does support, as long as your intention is to have different targets. For your other UC [2], the WG did not feel comfortable defining the URI for “educational use”. Renato Iannella, Monegraph Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Use_Cases#POE.UC.26_Data_Quality_Policy <https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Use_Cases#POE.UC.26_Data_Quality_Policy> [2] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Use_Cases#POE.UC.27_Europeana.2FDPLA_In_Copyright_-_Educational_Use_Only <https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Use_Cases#POE.UC.27_Europeana.2FDPLA_In_Copyright_-_Educational_Use_Only>
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 01:36:05 UTC