- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:52:35 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>, POE Comment list <public-poe-comments@w3.org>, Riccardo Albertoni <riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Hi Antoine, Just a heads up... as per the minutes of today's WG call [1], you'll be getting an e-mail from Renato soon in response to your welcome comments on the P&OE work [2]. Renato knows the ODRL spec inside out so he'll go into detail but I think there are 2 issues. 1. The WG thinks the use case can probably be met with the existing ODRL spec (i.e. you're not presenting new requirements, although the WG will need to expolain how to do what you're trying to do). 1a. That said, it throws up the notion of attaching different bits of the policy to different resources (the Dataset and the Distribution) which needs to be addressed. 2. You also raise the issue of validation. The WG is likely to leave validation to external mechanisms. This is likely to lead to a suggestion of handing the problem off to SHACL but the spec is likely to support any validation technique. More from Renato soon. Phil. For tracker: Action-32 [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/10/03-poe-minutes#item03 [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poe-comments/2016Sep/0002.html -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 13:52:47 UTC