- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 18:37:18 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Your proposal 3 solves the inconsistency in the POE spec, but it doesn't solve this issue. If I understand well, removing deprecated terms as instances of Action would amount to fully deprecate them, which doesn't give the kind of correspondance I was hoping for. Yes an ODRL Policy can inherit a CC License. This would be a way to present some mapping at the level of instances (of policies) CC Licenses are instance of POE Policy I believe. Regarding your comment on odrl:attribute, it may be ok, but I'd prefer to look at this in the context of a fuller mapping. On 18/05/17 04:32, Renato Iannella wrote: > Sure, please create seperate issues for the discussion > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/158#issuecomment-302283794>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAnprX1ZL0xxDH5k6w0o3QkuxDTP6semks5r662igaJpZM4NNqQV>. > -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/158#issuecomment-302504720 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2017 18:37:25 UTC