- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 18:15:36 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Reactions to the proposal: 1. This can be fine, but - why not odrl:hasPolicy instead of odrl:policy? - regarding your mapping to MO: wouldn't the property be equivalent (sameAs) mo:hasPolicy? (there might be hidden semantic traps in a strict equivalence, but I must suggest it still :-) ) - regarding your mapping to DC: wouldn't the property be a super-property of dc:rights? - you shouldn't forget an inverse axiom between odrl:target and the new property 2. OK! -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/184#issuecomment-302497237 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2017 18:15:49 UTC