- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 01:42:32 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
1) Do you mean the examples in the Encoding section of the Vocab document? We state this: https://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#conformance 2) I assume we need test cass for all serialisations @philarcher1 3) Yes, we have discussed this a lot. The proposal is that we ask implementors (again) which terms they use and document that (like we did the first time [1]). From that we can split the Vocab into normative/non-normative. Another option is to split the Vocab into **Core** (normative) and **Common** (non-normative) and only have the IM terms in the Core. So the spec says the IM is the core and the rest is all recommended terms. [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/File:ODRLImplementationSurvey-2016-Dec-07.pdf -- GitHub Notification of comment by riannella Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/155#issuecomment-298476900 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2017 01:42:39 UTC