- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:05:34 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Hi @vroddon your link points to the Vocabulary & Expression document, @simonstey talks about the ODRL Model Info document - at e.g. https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/ Re Simon's issues: 1. Right, the Constraint is called "entity" in its specification in 3.8 - should be aligned in 3.8.1 2. 3.8 says in the first para "Constraints are a logical expression ...". For me the entity is the wider term and expression the more specific, a kind of entity type. Like entity vs person/location/company ... 3. Right, 3.8.1 doesn't use a language defining the term Constraint Relations. 4. see my suggested language below 5. see my suggested language below My suggestion for the name and first para of 3.8.1: I think Contraints could be a plural while Relations should be a singular --> "**Constraints Relation** A Constraints Relation defines a relationship between two Constraints and is expressed by a Constraint entity which holds an atomic Constraint in each of the leftOperand and the rightOperand. The operator sets the relationship. An atomic Constraint is an entity not including a Constraints Relation." -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/117#issuecomment-284366898 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 6 March 2017 11:05:40 UTC