[poe] Issue: Should hasRightOperandReference survive? marked as question

vroddon has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe as 
"question":

== Should hasRightOperandReference survive? ==
I believe there was a redundant property. Since :hasRightOperand can 
have as range a :RightOperandReference, In such a case, I don't see 
the point of maintaining a property like :hasRightOperandReference.  I
 have commented the redundant property, to be deleted if I dont hear 
the contrary.

```
:hasRightOperand
        a rdf:Property ;
        rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ;
        rdfs:label "Has Right Operand"@en ;
        skos:definition "The operand applied to an instance of a 
constraint."@en ;
        rdfs:range [
                a owl:Class ;
                owl:unionOf ( :RightOperandReference xsd:any ) ;
        ] ;
        rdfs:domain :Constraint .

#:rightOperandReference
#       a rdf:Property ;
#       rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ;
#       rdfs:label "Has Right Operand Reference"@en ;
#       skos:definition "A reference to the operand applied to an 
instance of a constraint."@en ;
#       skos:note "Represents a URI that must be dereferenced to 
obtain the actual right operand value"@en ;
#       rdfs:domain :Constraint ;
#   skos:scopeNote "Non-Normative"@en .
```


See https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/92

Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 22:27:49 UTC