- From: Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 22:27:43 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
vroddon has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe:
== Should hasRightOperandReference survive? ==
I believe there was a redundant property. Since :hasRightOperand can
have as range a :RightOperandReference, In such a case, I don't see
the point of maintaining a property like :hasRightOperandReference. I
have commented the redundant property, to be deleted if I dont hear
the contrary.
```
:hasRightOperand
a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ;
rdfs:label "Has Right Operand"@en ;
skos:definition "The operand applied to an instance of a
constraint."@en ;
rdfs:range [
a owl:Class ;
owl:unionOf ( :RightOperandReference xsd:any ) ;
] ;
rdfs:domain :Constraint .
#:rightOperandReference
# a rdf:Property ;
# rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ;
# rdfs:label "Has Right Operand Reference"@en ;
# skos:definition "A reference to the operand applied to an
instance of a constraint."@en ;
# skos:note "Represents a URI that must be dereferenced to
obtain the actual right operand value"@en ;
# rdfs:domain :Constraint ;
# skos:scopeNote "Non-Normative"@en .
```
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/92 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 22:27:49 UTC