- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 05:55:23 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
@stuartmyles, there are some major differences between RDF/XML and JSON-LD. I believe it is possible to come up with an encoding of the model that **is** acceptable for JSON users who are not RDF users. JSON-LD has been defined with that goal in mind. It is not perfect, but I believe it goes a long way in this direction. Several WG-s have done this (Social Web, Annotation, even the CSV on the Web). RDF/XML is and remains problematic even for XML users. There is no equivalent to the JSON-LD frames that would allow to use some sort of an RDF/XML dialect and. primarily, there is no equivalent to the JSON-LD `@context` notion that can hide most of the features that irritate non-RDF users (usage of various namespaces, for example). -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/46#issuecomment-266652876 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2016 05:55:29 UTC