- From: stuartmyles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:20:14 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
But wouldn't this same logic apply to the XML encoding too? Why not just auto-generate XML from the ODRL Ontology? On the other hand, don't we need an JSON schema for people who don't care about (or don't like or have never heard of) RDF? Regards, Stuart On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Ivan Herman <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > > Now that we will support JSON-LD, does that mean we don't have to define > our own JSON Schema as it is auto-generated from the ODRL Ontology? > > > I indeed do not think we should define a JSON Schema. I believe, apart > from what we already do in the information model document[1], we have to > define a JSON-LD @context file that maps the JSON-LD to the RDF vocabulary > and we *may* define, informally, JSON-LD Frames that define a preferred way > of expressing things in JSON-LD (and that should reflect the way all the > examples are in the info. model document. > > At least this is the way the Anno WG did it, see[2]. > > Ivan > > 1. http://w3c.github.io/poe/model/ <http://w3c.github.io/poe/model/> > 2. https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/#json-ld-frames > > — > You are receiving this because you were assigned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/46#issuecomment-265750248>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADwBf_E-fTUjGDYI0f1tX5uvbUkbhmUoks5rGBHKgaJpZM4KZWR0> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by stuartmyles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/46#issuecomment-266474827 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 16:20:21 UTC