- From: Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:07:01 -0400
- To: "Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Working Group" <public-png@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAG3W2KczFcNeBCTFrQPPm4YXD5T1oyj+p=8yGWE=2sWNRfpaDw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello everyone, It's been a while. We have a meeting this coming Monday. Here are some discussion topics. I surely forgot some, so feel free to reply and add topics. - We're waiting on a few ISO specs, as seen in the 4th edition meta-issue <https://github.com/w3c/png/issues/536>. - Fares, are you able to join? Any update? - Do we know when AOM's version of gain curves is expected? - C2PA metadata inclusion - Leonard, would you be able to join to discuss this? - Chris Lilley would like to add iDOT <https://github.com/w3c/png/issues/530> - We should discuss possibly supporting mismatched ICC profiles <https://github.com/w3c/png/issues/478>. For example a gray ICC profile in an RGB image which happens to only store grayscale values. Or an RGB ICC profile in a grayscale image, where only the R=G=B values are used. - We can probably make progress on: - SMPTE ST 2094-10 average luminance metadata <https://github.com/w3c/png/issues/311>. Should we recommend a specific tone mapping algorithm? (Not 2094-10?) - Is there some phrasing we can use to require a decoder be consistent with its choice of tone mapping algorithms when given the same chunks <https://github.com/w3c/png/issues/319>? Again, chime in if I missed some topics. I feel confident I have. Thanks! See you Monday!
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2025 13:07:17 UTC