Re: [PNG] Cancel meeting?

I went ahead and cancelled the meating.
I'll follow up with liaisons and make a meta-bug to track Fourth Edition
progress.

On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 2:13 AM Cosmin Truta <ctruta@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 8:23 AM Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <
> programmax@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Given that list, it looks like we're almost entirely waiting on other
>> specs. If we wanted, we could try to get ahead of things. But that could
>> also backfire if a spec is not made free or if the AOM version is slightly
>> different.
>>
>
> Chris (@svgeesus), about negative cHRM values, PR 48 is good to go from my
> point of view, in spite of John (@jbowler) initial objections.
>
> Given that, I'm in favor of cancelling meetings until we are unblocked.
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> I agree that we need not meet now, but we do need to get some of these
> (ideally all of these) implemented in libpng eventually. I'm still busy
> with tidying up libpng-1.8 before its imminent release, so I can't take
> this, myself, right now.
> Volunteers?
>
> Sincerely,
> Cosmin
>