Re: [PNG] Cancel meeting?

On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 8:23 AM Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <
programmax@gmail.com> wrote:

> Given that list, it looks like we're almost entirely waiting on other
> specs. If we wanted, we could try to get ahead of things. But that could
> also backfire if a spec is not made free or if the AOM version is slightly
> different.
>

Chris (@svgeesus), about negative cHRM values, PR 48 is good to go from my
point of view, in spite of John (@jbowler) initial objections.

Given that, I'm in favor of cancelling meetings until we are unblocked.
> Thoughts?
>

I agree that we need not meet now, but we do need to get some of these
(ideally all of these) implemented in libpng eventually. I'm still busy
with tidying up libpng-1.8 before its imminent release, so I can't take
this, myself, right now.
Volunteers?

Sincerely,
Cosmin