Re: [PNG] Meeting minutes - Jun 10th, 2024

CAUTION: This mailing list is public. An archive is kept. For example, here
is the perma-link to this email thread
<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-png/2024Jun/0012.html>.

I'm not sure if we have a private, WG-only mailing list. If not, we can
email drafts to each member of the WG
<https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/png/participants/>. It is a bit tedious but
perhaps there aren't many drafts?
However, for W3C to use the ISO spec at all, it would need to be public,
right? Are only the drafts private? Will the final publication be freely
available?

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 12:22 PM Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
wrote:

> With the liaison in place, there should be no problem sharing the draft
> internally to the WG (such as via this mailing list) – but you could NOT
> post it to GH (since that is public).
>
>
>
> Leonard
>
>
>
> *From: *Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
> *Date: *Monday, June 10, 2024 at 12:18 PM
> *To: *Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>, Fares Alhassen <
> falhassen@google.com>
> *Cc: *public-png@w3.org <public-png@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [PNG] Meeting minutes - Jun 10th, 2024
>
> EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.
>
>
> On 2024-06-10 11:51, Chris Blume (ProgramMax) wrote:
> >
> > IIRC the last update of the liaising was some questions we had. I'm
> > not sure we heard back on those. It was a while ago so we can rekindle
> > that flame.
>
> Yes. One of the main questions was about being unable to share the draft
> ISO specification, for WG discussion. We didn't hear back on that, and
> there have been more recent drafts that we have not seen at all.
> Naturally that makes it harder to draft proposals.
>
> --
> Chris Lilley
> @svgeesus
> Technical Director @ W3C
> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
>
>