- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 23:17:48 +0300
- To: public-png@w3.org
On 2024-07-06 13:52, Chris Blume (ProgramMax) wrote: > If we do like the idea of 1.3 instead of "Third Edition" (and > eventually 2.0), there is another topic to discuss: > First Edition would have been 1.0. Second Edition would have been 1.1. > That means Third Edition would be 1.2, not 1.3. While I understand the reasoning, the Second Edition corresponded to PNG 1.2 in fact http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/spec/1.2/ > > I could be wrong, but I think 1.2 & "Third Edition" takes a split > second of hesitation that lends towards silly mistakes. And even > though 1.3 would be wrong, I think it removes that hesitation. Note that the W3C shortname for PNG third edition is png-3 :) https://www.w3.org/TR/png-3/ -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director @ W3C W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
Received on Monday, 8 July 2024 20:17:46 UTC