Re: [EXTERNAL] [PNG] Thoughts on semver-ish naming? "Third Edition" -> 1.3

To be clear, it sounds like both of you are suggesting 2.0 instead of
"Third Edition"?

I was thinking of using 1.3 and saving 2.0 for potential breaking changes
in the future.
But you're right. Numbers are cheap. And I think the SemVer idea of a major
number (the 2 here) should be more of a human impact and less of about
"breaking changes". Adding animations via APNG is a major human impact. I
could be easily convinced to call this 2.0.

On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 7:48 PM John Bowler <john.cunningham.bowler@gmail.com>
wrote:

> To quote the appropriate quote, "Numbers are cheap."  I suggest you use
> 2.0.  I believe Marketing would agree.
>
> John Bowler
>